'One Laptop per Child' project debate

In November 2005 MIT's Nicholas Negroponte first showcased a prototype of a $100 robust laptop for the developing world’s children which was welcomed at the time by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan as an "expression of global solidarity".

The 'One Laptop per Child' project has had its critics, some asking how anyone could build such a computer when the screens alone cost about $100, others questioning the value of computers to both learning and economic development.

A year later and about to launch, the cost of the finished product when the machines go into full-scale production by Taiwan-based Quanta Computer is likely to be nearer $150 than $100 but it is hoped that the $100 target will be achieved with volume if they prove successful.

Kofi Annan has said that with the laptops "Children will be able to learn by doing, not just through instruction - they will be able to open up new fronts for their education, particularly peer-to-peer learning," and that the initiative was "inspiring", and held the promise of special and economic development for children in developing countries.

Do you think that a low cost laptop for the developing world’s children represents worthwhile aid?

Do you think that the money spent on equipment would be better spent towards more teachers?

Do you agree with Bill Gates, Microsoft’s chairman and a leading philanthropist for the third world, when he has questioned whether the concept is right to “just taking what we do in the rich world” and assuming that that is something good for the developing world, too?

Where do you stand on the 'One Laptop per Child' debate?

Participate in this weeks open survey 'One Laptop per Child' project debate

(For more detailed information on the project please visit the One Laptop per Child website.)